सुर्जन चरित महाकाव्यम् (कवि चन्द्रशेखर - बूँदी हाड़ा चौहान राजवंश शौर्य इतिहास सटीक)

रु णीम् = ऽ । ऽ (ज + ग if it's । ऽ । ऽ: but वा is guru!) Wait, why is Pada 2 ending in बत निषेव्य वारुणीम्? ब(।) त(।) नि(।) षे(ऽ) व्य(।) वा(ऽ) रु(।) णीम्(ऽ) = 9 syllables! Then before 'बत': 13 - 9 = 4 syllables! 4 syllables before बत: स-न्न-ति-रा-ग-तो (6 syllables? + 9 = 15?) Wait, count: ... बत निषेव्य वारुणीम्: ब (1) त (2) नि (3) षे (4) व्य (5) वा (6) रु (7) णीम् (8) 8 syllables! Then Pada 2 has 13 syllables, so the beginning must be 13 - 8 = 5 syllables! What 5 syllables? Wait, if it's 13 syllables: स-न्न-ति-रा-ग-तो = 6 syllables! 6 + 8 = 14? Wait, look at verse 34: वशगो बभूव बिसिनीसुहृत् तथा (11 syllables? Wait, earlier I counted 13: व-श-गो (3) ब-भू-व (3) बि-सि-नी (3) सु-हृत् (2) त-था (2) = 13 syllables!) Let's re-scan verse 34, pada 1: व (।) श (।) गो (ऽ) - स-गण ब (।) भू (ऽ) व (।) - ज-गण बि (।) सि (।) नी (ऽ) - स-गण सु (।) हृ (guru because of त्) त् त (laghu? No, तथा has tha guru) सु (।) हृत्त (ऽ) था (ऽ)? Wait, सु (।) हृत्(ऽ) त(।) था(ऽ) = । ऽ । ऽ = ज + ग! Yes! 13 syllables! Every pada has 13 syllables! Now let's check verse 34, pada 2: वरुणस्य हन्त हरितोऽङ्कमाश्रितः (13 syllables): व (।) रु (।) ण (guru because of स्य) = व रु णस्य ( । । ऽ ) - स-गण ह (।) न्त (ऽ) ह (।) = ज-गण रि (।) तो (ऽ) ऽङ्क (ऽ)? Wait: रि (।) तो (ऽ) ङ्क (guru)? म (।) न्त? Let's count syllables: व-रु-ण-स्य ह-न्त ह-रि-तो-ऽङ्क-मा-श्रि-तः 1: व 2: रु 3: ण्ड (ण) 4: स्य (हन्त makes स्य guru? ह makes it guru?) Wait, count individual vowel-bearing syllables: 1 व, 2 रु, 3 ण, 4 स्य, 5 ह, 6 न्त, 7 ह, 8 रि, 9 तो, 10 ऽङ्क (मा), 11 श्रि, 12 तः Wait: व(1) रु(2) ण्ड(3) स्य(4) ह(5) न्त(6) ह(7) रि(8) तो(9) ऽङ्क(10) मा(11) श्रि(12) तः(13) = 13! Yes, exactly 13!

Now let's check verse 33 Pada 2 again: ... बत निषेव्य वारुणीम्: If Pada 2 has 13 syllables: What are the 13 syllables? Count from end: 13: णीम् 12: रु 11: वा 10: व्य 9: षे 8: नि 7: त 6: ब 5: तो 4: ग 3: रा 2: ति / त 1: न / न्न? Where does Pada 2 start?! Look at line 2: उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि सन्नतिरागतो बत निषेव्य वारुणीम् । Wait! Look at the first word: "उररीकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि" - wait, does it say "उररो"? The first word has: उ - र - रो (or री? There's an e-matra on top? No, it's उ - र - री, the curve is like र followed by ी). Wait, look at : "उररीकृताखिल..." wait, look at the first 'र', then second 'र': it has a stroke going left and right? It's 'रो'? No, 'उररीकृत' is a famous idiom meaning 'स्वीकृत' (accepted, admitted)! Look at the Hindi translation: "अपनी सारी किरणों को खर्च करना स्वीकार करके"! "स्वीकार करके" = "उररीकृत्य / उररीकृता"! The printer printed 'उररीकृत' or 'उररीकृता...'? Wait, in the image, above the second र, there is an o-matra? It looks like 'उररीकृता' but with a broken type, or 'उररीकृता'.

Now look at: "सन्नतिरागतो" Wait, why does Hindi translate: "और उत्कट राग के कारण"? "उत्कट राग के कारण" = "सन्नतिरागतो"? Wait! Could it be "सन्ततिरागतो"? सन्तति = continuous? Wait, what if it's "सन्नतिरागतो"? No, look at the characters: स न्न ति रा ग तो Look closely at the letters: स (sa) न्न (nna) ति (ti) - wait, is there an i-matra? Look above: there is no i-matra, but wait, look at the letter between 'न्न' and 'रा': It has a loop to the left: 'ति'? No, that's a 'ति' or 'त'? Wait, is it "सन्नतिरागतो"? Let's look at the print: 'स', 'न्न', 'ति' or 'त'? Wait, is it "सन्नतिरागतो"? Yes, in the printed image, it literally says: "सन्नतिरागतो" or "सन्ततिरागतो" or "सन्नतरागतो"? Wait, look at 'त' in 'रागतो': the top bar goes down and loops left. Now look at the letter before 'रा': it is identical to 'त'! It is 'त'! Wait, is there an 'ि' matra? No! Is there an 'े' matra? No! Wait, what is before that 'त'? It is 'न्न'! So is it: स - न्न - त - रा - ग - तो = "सन्नत-रागतो"? Wait! "सन्नत" means bowed down / setting! Wait, what if it's "सन्नतरागतो"? Wait, does "सन्नत" mean bowed down (setting sun)? Wait, why does the Hindi say "और उत्कट राग के कारण"? "उत्कट राग" - "सान्द्रतर"? But the Sanskrit has "सन्नति" / "सन्नत"? Wait! Look at the Hindi: "और उत्कट राग के कारण वरुण की पश्चिम दिशा का उपभोग करके अब विवश होकर क्षितिज पर गिरने वाले सूर्य ने आकाश तक को छोड़ना प्रारंभ कर दिया, जैसे कोई शराबी अपना सारा द्रव्य खर्च करके तथा उत्कट अनुराग के कारण मदिरा पीकर बेहोश होकर धरती पर गिरता हुआ अपने वस्त्र तक को खोल दे ॥३३॥" Wait! "उत्कट अनुराग के कारण" in the shloka: "राग" = अनुराग! What means "उत्कट"? "सन्तत"? "सन्ततरागतो"? Look at the conjunct: could it be 'न्त'? In 'हन्त' , the 'न्त' has: horizontal stroke, vertical stroke with a loop. Look at this glyph in : It has: 'न' attached to 'त'! Wait! Is it 'न्त'? Yes! If it is 'न्त', then: स + न्त + त = "सन्ततरागतो"! Wait, "सन्तत" (santata) = continuous, intense, uninterrupted! In Hindi: "उत्कट"! Wait, but is it 'सन्तत' or 'सन्नति'? Wait, let's look at: स - न्त - त - रा - ग - तो. Wait, count the letters:

1. स
2. ˜त / न्त / न्न ?
3. त ? Wait, if it is 'सन्तत', why is there no anusvara? In Sanskrit printing, 'न्त' is written as 'न्' + 'त' or with anusvara? Often written as 'सन्तत'! Wait, if the first conjunct is 'न्त', then why is there another 'त'? Wait, look at the glyph again: Is it 'स' then 'न्न' then 'ति'? Wait, look at the image really, really closely: Letter 1: स Letter 2: न्न (two नs vertically or horizontally? Horizontally: न् + न = न्न) Letter 3: त (ta) with an i-matra? Wait, above 'त', is there an i-matra curve? No, the line above 'ति' is clean. Wait, what if it's 'सन्नतिरागतो'? Let's re-read the glyph: Wait! Could it be "सन्नतिरागतो"? Let's transcribe what is PRINTED. In Devanagari, whether it's 'सन्नतिरागतो' or 'सन्ततरागतो': Look at the third character: it is 'ति'? No, look at 'ति' in 'क्षितिज' in Hindi: the matra goes to the left of त! Here, there is NO stroke to the left of the third letter! Wait, is there a 'ि' to the left? Look between glyph 2 and glyph 3: No, there is a space, no vertical line of 'ि'. Wait, what about the stroke on top? There is none. Wait, is glyph 2 and 3: Look at: स (sa) न्न (nna) ति (ti) -- wait! Is it 'सन्नति'? Wait, look at 'स', then 'न्' with 'न' below? It's 'न्न'. Then 'त' (ta). Wait, look at 'सन्नतिरागतो': could it be 'सन्नतिरागतो'? Some fonts have 'ति' with the matra going behind? No, in Devanagari 'ि' is always before. Wait, is the letter 'त'? Yes, it's 'त'! Wait, is the letter before it 'न'? No, look at: 'स' + 'न' + 'न'? Wait, look at: स - न्न - त - रा - ग - तो -> सन्नत-रागतो? Wait, what about meter? If it's: उ-र-री-कृ-ता-खि-ल-व-सु-व्य-यो-ऽपि (12) स-न्न-त-रा-ग-तो (6) ब-त (2) नि-षे-व्य (3) वा-रु-णीम् (3) Total = 12 + 6 + 2 + 3 + 3 = 26 syllables in line 1! 26 / 2 = 13 syllables per pada! Pada 1 = 13 syllables! Pada 2 = 13 syllables! Wait! 12 + 6 + 2 + 3 + 3 = 26! If each pada is 13 syllables: Pada 1 = 13 syllables! Pada 2 = 13 syllables! Pada 1 ends at: 13th syllable! 12 syllables is: उ-र-री-कृ-ता-खि-ल-व-सु-व्य-यो-ऽपि (12) So the 13th syllable MUST BE: "स"! Wait! "स" alone is 1 syllable! Then Pada 2 has: न्न-त-रा-ग-तो (5?) - wait, 'न्न' cannot start a word! Wait! Is Pada 1: "उररीकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि सन्" ? If the word is "सन्" (13th syllable)! Then Pada 2 starts with: "नतिरागतो"? Wait! Look at the word! Is it: स न् + न ... Wait! "सन्नतिरागतो" = "सन्" + "नतिरागतो" or "सन्नतिरागतो"? Wait, why would Pada 2 start with 'नतिरागतो'? Does "नतिरागतो" make sense? Wait! "नतिराग"? No, the Hindi says: "और उत्कट राग के कारण" - wait, where does "उत्कट" come from? Wait! In Sanskrit, "अतिराग" = उत्कट राग! अतिराग = excessive passion! "सन्नतिरागतो" = सन् + अतिरागतो = सन्नतिरागतो! सन् (being / having done so) + अतिरागतः (due to excessive passion / deep redness)! सन् + अतिरागतः = सन्नतिरागतः! Because सन् ends in 'न्', and 'अतिरागतो' begins with 'अ'! When 'न्' is preceded by a short vowel and followed by a vowel, it doubles (ङमो ह्रस्वादचि ङमुन्नित्यम्): सन् + अतिरागतो = सन्नतिरागतो! BINGO! ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT! सन् (laghu? No, सन् preceded by short vowel 'पि' in व्ययोऽपि सन्: ऽपि is laghu, सन् has 'न्' which doubles to न्न before अ: ऽपिन् + न + ति + रा + ग + तो)! Wait: व्य-यो-ऽपि (। ऽ ।) सन् (ऽ) -> 13th syllable of Pada 1! Then Pada 2 begins with: अतिरागतो -> with doubling: न-ति-रा-ग-तो! न (।) ति (।) रा (ऽ) = स-गण! ग (।) तो (ऽ) ब (।) = ज-गण! त नि षे ( । । ऽ ) = स-गण! व्य वा रु णीम् ( । ऽ । ऽ ) = ज-गण + ग! IT FITS THE METER 1000% PERFECTLY! "सन्नतिरागतो" = सन् + अतिरागतो! And अतिराग = "उत्कट राग"! Everything is completely solved and crystal clear!

Now let's check all the lines and transcribe meticulously.

Line : १५६ सुर्जनचरितमहाकाव्यम्

Line : उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि सन्नतिरागतो बत निषेव्य वारुणीम् । Wait, is the first word "उररो..." or "उररी..."? Look at the first word: 'उ' 'र' 'रो' or 'री'? Look at the stroke above the second 'र': It has a loop to the left and a curve down to the right, wait, does it have a top stroke like 'ो'? Look at 'उररी': Wait, in , the first letter is उ, second is र, third is र with a matra. Wait, let's zoom in on that third letter: Is it 'रो' or 'री'? It looks like 'रो': there is an e-matra on top and an aa-matra to the right! Wait, look at 'रो' in 'रागतो': it has the exact same top slant! Wait, did the typesetter make a typo 'उररोकृताखिल...' or is it 'उररीकृताखिल...'? Wait, look at 'री' in 'वारुणीम्': the 'ी' matra has a curve to the left at the top. Look at 'उररो...': there is a vertical line after र, and a stroke on top slanting to the left, which is 'ो'! Wait, is it a typo in the book? Yes! The book actually printed "उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि" (a printing error for उररीकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि, or maybe it is 'उररो'?). Let's look closely at the image: It is definitely printed as "उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि" (with a 'ो' matra). Wait, let's look again: Is that an 'ो' or a 'री'? Wait, the vertical bar after र: above it, the curve goes to the left, like a standard Devanagari 'ी' matra? But there is also an e-stroke? No, wait! Look at 'री' in 'वारुणीम्': the matra is a vertical stem with a top curve going to the left. Now look at 'उररो': it has a vertical stem with a stroke on top, but the stroke doesn't loop all the way over to र; it just slants left, like an 'े' on the vertical stem! That makes it 'ो'! Wait, but could it be intended as 'उररी'? The prompt says: "Transcribe ... line by line into pure, clean Markdown in Unicode Devanagari." Usually, if it's an obvious misprint or if it's 'उररोकृता...', wait, look at 'उररी': in many old fonts, the 'ी' matra on 'र' was sometimes set oddly, but wait, look at 'दिनमणिर्महीतले': 'री' is not there, but 'ही' has a standard loop. Wait, look at : is that 'उररो' or 'उररी'? Wait, look at the footnote: (३३) वसुः किरणः । वसु धनम् । वारुणी पश्चिमा दिक् मदिरा च । Let's see if we should transcribe what is printed: It looks very much like "उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि". But wait, could it be 'उररीकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि'? Let's look at the top curve: it has a circle at the top? No, it's an 'ो'. Let's look at whether it's 'उररो' or 'उररी'. I'll write 'उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि' or 'उररीकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि'? In Hindi translation: "स्वीकार करके", which is strictly the meaning of "उररीकृत्य / उररीकृत". But in text, it has 'रो'. Wait, let's look at the pixel level: Wait, the left of the loop: the stroke goes up from the vertical bar, curves up and left, and touches nothing. That is 'ो'! So it's printed "उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि". Wait, let me check if someone could read it as 'उररो' or 'उररी'. Let's look closely: wait, it actually looks like an 'ो' or 'ौ'? Just 'ो'.

Line : विवशः पतन् दिनमणिर्महीतले परिमोक्तुमम्बरमपि प्रचक्रमे ॥३३॥ (Note: प्रचक्रमे ॥ ३३॥)

Line : अपनी सारी किरणों को खर्च करना स्वीकार करके और उत्कट राग के कारण वरुण की

Line : पश्चिम दिशा का उपभोग करके अब विवश होकर क्षितिज पर गिरने वाले सूर्य ने आकाश

Line : तक को छोड़ना प्रारंभ कर दिया, जैसे कोई शराबी अपना सारा द्रव्य खर्च करके तथा उत्कट

Line : अनुराग के कारण मदिरा पीकर बेहोश होकर धरती पर गिरता हुआ अपने वस्त्र तक को

Line : खोल दे ॥३३॥

Line : वशगो बभूव बिसिनीसुहृत् तथा वरुणस्य हन्त हरितोऽङ्कमाश्रितः ।

Line : इतरासु दिक्षु भगवानयं यथा न करप्रसारणविधावपि क्षमः ॥३४॥

Line : वरुण की दिशा (पश्चिम) की गोद में जाकर सूर्य भगवान् उसके इतने अधीन हो गये

Line : कि अन्य दिशाओं की ओर कर (हाथ; किरणों) बढ़ाने का सामर्थ्य भी उनमें नहीं रहा ॥३४॥

Line : जगतीषु योतिमहितो महःपतिर्महसां भरेण दुरवापदर्शनः ।

Line : अवलोकते स्म सुखदृश्यमप्यमुं विधिना व्यपेतविभवं न कश्चन ॥३५॥

Line : जो सूर्य संसार में अत्यन्त महान् तथा समृद्ध थे और जिनके तेज के कारण उनकी ओर देखना

Line : तक कठिन था वे ही अब विधिवश ऐश्वर्य खो बैठे और अब सुलभ-दर्शन होने पर भी उनकी ओर

Line : कोई देखता तक नहीं ॥३५॥

Line : अथ वारुणीभजनजातकल्मषं परिमार्ष्टुमुद्यत इव त्विषां पतिः ।

Line : भृगुपातसाहसरसे दधन् मनः शिखरं जगाम चरमक्षमाभृतः ॥ ३६॥

Line : वारुणी (वरुण की स्त्री अर्थात् पश्चिम दिशा; मदिरा) का उपभोग करने के कारण उत्पन्न

Line : पाप का प्रायश्चित्त करने के लिये ही मानों सूर्य ऊँचे स्थान से गिरकर (अपना कलुषित शरीर

Line : छोड़ देने के लिये ) अस्ताचल के शिखर पर चढ़े ॥३६॥

Line : खरकालखड्गदलितस्य निर्दयं प्रशमं दिनस्य सहसा गमिष्यतः । Wait, look at line 23: "खरकालखड्गदलितस्य निर्दयं प्रशमं दिनस्य सहसा गमिष्यतः ।" Wait, above 'सहसा', there is a handwritten correction/mark? There is a small mark above 'ह', like a caret or blot. But the word is clearly 'सहसा'. Wait, check meter of verse 37: ख र का ( । । ऽ ) ल ख ड्ग ( । ऽ । - wait: ल is laghu, खड् is guru, ग is laghu = । ऽ । ) द लि त ( । । ऽ ) - wait: त is followed by स्य, so तस्य is guru! द लि तस्य ( । । ऽ ) नि र्द यं ( । ऽ । ) - नि(laghu? No, निर् is guru. Wait: ख-र-का ( । । ऽ ) ल-ख-ड्ग ( । ऽ । ) द-लि-त ( । । ऽ ) ? No, दलितस्य: द(।) लि(।) तस्य(ऽ) = स-गण! नि-र्द्र-यं? निर्दयं: निर्(ऽ) द(।) यं(ऽ)? But we need ज-गण ( । ऽ । )! Wait, why would निर्दयं be । ऽ ।? Is the word 'निदयं'? No, 'निर्दयं' is printed. Wait, let's look at the next pada: रुधिरा Titan... रुधिरा Titan? No! "रुधिरारुणं शिर इवार्कमण्डलं न्यपतत् पयःसु चरमस्य नीरधेः ॥३७॥" रु धि रा ( । । ऽ ) - स रु णं शि ( । ऽ । ) - ज र इ वा ( । । ऽ ) - स र्क म ण्ड लं ( । ऽ । ऽ ) - ज + ग! न्य प तत् ( । । ऽ ) - स प यः सु ( । ऽ । ) - ज च र म ( । । ऽ ) - स स्य नी र धेः ( । ऽ । ऽ ) - ज + ग! Every pada is मञ्जुभाषिणी!

Line : रुधिरारुणं शिर इवार्कमण्डलं न्यपतत् पयःसु चरमस्य नीरधेः ॥३७॥

Line : काल की तीक्ष्ण तलवार से निर्दयतापूर्वक काटे गये और रुधिर से लाल दिन के सिर के

Line : समान लगने वाला सूर्यबिम्ब पश्चिमी समुद्र के जल में गिर पड़ा ॥३७॥

Line : उचितं तदेव यदतीव मत्सरा स्थितिमाससाद न चिरं पितृप्रसूः ।

Line : स्फुटमन्तरायितमकारणं यया बत यामिनीदिवसयोः समागमे ॥३८॥

Line : यह अच्छा ही हुआ कि अत्यन्त ईर्ष्यालु सन्ध्या, जो निष्कारण ही दिन और रात्रि के समागम

Line : में रोड़ा बन रही थी, अधिक देर नहीं टिक सकी, जैसे कोई अत्यन्त ईर्ष्यालु दादी-सास, जो

Line : निष्कारण ही अपने पौत्र-पौत्रवधू के समागम में रोड़ा बन जाती है, वृद्धावस्था के कारण

Line : अधिक दिन जीवित नहीं रहती ॥३८॥

Line : (३३) वसुः किरणः । वसु धनम् । वारुणी पश्चिमा दिक् मदिरा च ।

Line : (३८) पितृप्रसूः सन्ध्या पितामही च ।

Wait, let's check the bottom: There is an illustration of a bird/swan and text: "Dr. Urmila Sharma Collection, Varanasi". Do we need to include this? Prompt says: "Include all historical narratives, verses, genealogy, battle accounts, dialogues, Hindi translation, and footnotes. Prefix each line with line marker like , ." Usually we don't need the collection stamp, but let's see. The prompt says "Include all historical narratives, verses, genealogy, battle accounts, dialogues, Hindi translation, and footnotes." So the collection watermark/stamp at the bottom is not part of the text, but the footnotes are!

Let's double-check all words in the verses and translations:

Verse 33: उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि (or उररीकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि? In the text it is clearly 'उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि', wait, look at 'उररी' vs 'उररो': let's write what is printed: 'उररोकृताखिलवसुव्ययोऽपि') सन्नतिरागतो बत निषेव्य वारुणीम् । विवशः पतन् दिनमणिर्महीतले परिमोक्तुमम्बरमपि प्रचक्रमे ॥ ३३॥

Hindi 33: अपनी सारी किरणों को खर्च करना स्वीकार करके और उत्कट राग के कारण वरुण की पश्चिम दिशा का उपभोग करके अब विवश होकर क्षितिज पर गिरने वाले सूर्य ने आकाश तक को छोड़ना प्रारंभ कर दिया, जैसे कोई शराबी अपना सारा द्रव्य खर्च करके तथा उत्कट अनुराग के कारण मदिरा पीकर बेहोश होकर धरती पर गिरता हुआ अपने वस्त्र तक को खोल दे ॥३३॥

Verse 34: वशगो बभूव बिसिनीसुहृत् तथा वरुणस्य हन्त हरितोऽङ्कमाश्रितः । इतरासु दिक्षु भगवानयं यथा न करप्रसारणविधावपि क्षमः ॥३४॥

Hindi 34: वरुण की दिशा (पश्चिम) की गोद में जाकर सूर्य भगवान् उसके इतने अधीन हो गये कि अन्य दिशाओं की ओर कर (हाथ ; किरणों) बढ़ाने का सामर्थ्य भी उनमें नहीं रहा ॥३४॥ Wait, is there a space before the semicolon? "(हाथ; किरणों)" or "(हाथ ; किरणों)"? It's "(हाथ ; किरणों)" or "(हाथ; किरणों)". Looks like "(हाथ; किरणों)".

Verse 35: जगतीषु योतिमहितो महःपतिर्महसां भरेण दुरवापदर्शनः । Wait, is it "योतिमहितो" or "द्योतिमहितो"? Look at the first word of : "जगतीषु योतिमहितो" or "द्योतिमहितो"? Wait! Look at the first letter after जगतीषु: It is: 'यो' or 'द्यो'? Wait! "जगतीषु" ends in षु. Next word: Does it have 'द्य'? Look at the character: It has a 'य' with 'ो'? Wait, is there a 'द' attached to 'य'? In Sanskrit typography, 'द्य' often looks like 'द' + 'य' or just a special glyph. But here, look at 'द्य': Look at "उद्यत": the 'द्य' has a loop with a tail! Look at : It is 'यो'! Wait, why 'योतिमहितो'? Wait, what meter is verse 35? मञ्जुभाषिणी: ज ग ती ( । । ऽ ) - स-गण! षु यो ति ( । ऽ । ) - ज-गण! म हि तो ( । । ऽ ) - स-गण! म हः प ( । ऽ । ) - ज-गण! तिर् (ऽ) - wait, महःपतिर्महसां: Let's count: ज-ग-ती-षु (4) यो-ति-म-हि-तो (5) म-हः-प-ति-र्म-ह-सां (7) That's 16 syllables! That's too many! WAIT! Look at line 13: जगतीषु योतिमहितो महःपतिर्महसां भरेण दुरवापदर्शनः । Wait, let's count syllables:

1. ज
2. ग
3. ती
4. षु
5. यो
6. ति
7. म
8. हि
9. तो
10. म
11. हः
12. प
13. तिर्
14. म
15. ह
16. सां
17. भ
18. रे
19. ण
20. दु
21. र
22. वा
23. प
24. द
25. र्श
26. नः Total = 26 syllables in line 13! Line 13 contains TWO PADAS! (13 + 13 = 26 syllables!) Pada 1: जगतीषु योतिमहितो महःपतिर् (13 syllables!) Pada 2: महसां भरेण दुरवापदर्शनः (13 syllables!) Line 14 contains TWO PADAS: Pada 3: अवलोकते स्म सुखदृश्यमप्यमुं (13 syllables!) Pada 4: विधिना व्यपेतविभवं न कश्चन (13 syllables!) ॥३५॥

YES! Pada 1 is: "जगतीषु योतिमहितो महःपतिर्" (13 syllables): 1 ज, 2 ग, 3 ती, 4 षु, 5 यो, 6 ति, 7 म, 8 हि, 9 तो, 10 म, 11 हः, 12 प, 13 तिर्! Wait, look at "योतिमहितो": Does it say "योतिमहितो" or "द्योतिमहितो"? Wait, if it was 'द्यो', 'षु' would become guru before 'द्य'! If 'षु' became guru, then 'षु द्यो ति' would be ऽ ऽ । which is NOT ज-गण ( । ऽ । )! Because षु is followed by single 'य', षु remains LAGHU! So: षु(।) यो(ऽ) ति(।) = ज-गण ( । ऽ । )! Wait, but is there a word "योति"? Wait! What does Hindi say? "जो सूर्य संसार में अत्यन्त महान् तथा समृद्ध थे और जिनके तेज के कारण..." Wait! "जो" = "यः"! Wait, "यः" + "अतिमहितः" = "योऽतिमहितो"! YES! "योऽतिमहितो"! Look at the text: It is: "यो" then an avagraha? Look between 'यो' and 'ति': Wait! Is that 'ति' or 'ऽति'? Look closely at: "यो" then... wait, is it 'ऽति'? No, look at the glyph: it's 'ति'! Wait, where did the avagraha go? Old presses often elided the avagraha! यः + अतिमहितः = योऽतिमहितः -> printed without avagraha: "योतिमहितो"! "योतिमहितो" = यः अतिमहितः (जो अत्यन्त महान् थे)! "अतिमहित" = अत्यन्त महान्! Look at the Hindi translation: "जो सूर्य संसार में अत्यन्त महान् तथा समृद्ध थे"! "जो" = यः (यो) "अत्यन्त महान्" = अतिमहितः (तिमहितो)! "समृद्ध थे" = महःपतिः! Everything makes 100% sense! And it is printed as: "योतिमहितो"!

Let's check : अवलोकते स्म सुखदृश्यमप्यमुं विधिना व्यपेतविभवं न कश्चन ॥३५॥ Hindi -: जो सूर्य संसार में अत्यन्त महान् तथा समृद्ध थे और जिनके तेज के कारण उनकी ओर देखना तक कठिन था वे ही अब विधिवश ऐश्वर्य खो बैठे और अब सुलभ-दर्शन होने पर भी उनकी ओर कोई देखता तक नहीं ॥३५॥

Verse 36 -: अथ वारुणीभजनजातकल्मषं परिमार्ष्टुमुद्यत इव त्विषां पतिः । भृगुपातसाहसरसे दधन् मनः शिखरं जगाम चरमक्षमाभृतः ॥ ३६॥

Hindi -: वारुणी (वरुण की स्त्री अर्थात् पश्चिम दिशा; मदिरा) का उपभोग करने के कारण उत्पन्न पाप का प्रायश्चित्त करने के लिये ही मानों सूर्य ऊँचे स्थान से गिरकर (अपना कलुषित शरीर छोड़ देने के लिये ) अस्ताचल के शिखर पर चढ़े ॥३६॥ (Notice space before ')' in "लिये )").

Verse 37 -: खरकालखड्गदलितस्य निर्दयं प्रशमं दिनस्य सहसा गमिष्यतः । रुधिरारुणं शिर इवार्कमण्डलं न्यपतत् पयःसु चरमस्य नीरधेः ॥३७॥

Hindi -: काल की तीक्ष्ण तलवार से निर्दयतापूर्वक काटे गये और रुधिर से लाल दिन के सिर के समान लगने वाला सूर्यबिम्ब पश्चिमी समुद्र के जल में गिर पड़ा ॥३७॥

Verse 38 -: उचितं तदेव यदतीव मत्सरा स्थितिमाससाद न चिरं पितृप्रसूः । स्फुटमन्तरायितमकारणं य