उपदेशसाहस्री (आदि शङ्कराचार्य - गद्य व पद्य भाग)

14 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS योगसंस्कारयोगेन गृहस्थसंज्ञं भवति । तदेव वनस्थसंस्कारेण तापससंज्ञं भवति । तदेव क्रियाविनिवृत्तिनिमित्तसंस्कारेण परि- व्राट्संज्ञं भवति । इत्येवं त्वत्तो भिन्नं भिन्नजात्यन्वयसंस्कारं शरीरम् ॥ २१ ॥ 21. "It is born, or is possessed of a form and a name and is purified by means of mantras relating to natal and other ceremonies. Sanctified again by the ceremony of investiture with the holy thread, it gets the appellation of a student. The same body is designated a house-holder when it undergoes the sacrament of being joined to a wife. That again is called a recluse when it undergoes the ceremonies pertaining to retire- ment into the forest. And it becomes known as a wandering monk when it performs the ceremonies lead- ing to the renunciation of all activities. Thus ¹ the body which has birth, lineage and purificatory ceremonies different (from the Self) is different from you. मनश्चेन्द्रियाणि च नामरूपात्मकान्येव 'अन्नमयं हि सोम्य मनः' इत्यादिश्रुतिभ्यः ॥ २२ ॥ 22. "That the mind and the senses are also of the nature of name and form is known from the Sruti, 'The mind, my child, consists of food ².' कथं चाहं भिन्नजात्यन्वयसंस्कारवर्जित इत्येतच्छृणु । योऽसौ नामरूपयोर्व्याकर्ता नामरूपधर्मविलक्षणः स एव नामरूपे व्या- ¹ See paras 15 and 16 above. ² Food is transformed into the substance of the mind and invi- gorates it. Chh. U., 6. 5. 4 and 6. 5. 6.

A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE 15 कुर्वन् सृष्ट्वेदं शरीरं स्वयं संस्कारधर्मवर्जितो नामरूपे इह प्रविष्टः अन्यैरदृष्टः स्वयं पश्यन्, तथाऽश्रुतः शृण्वन्, अमतो मन्वानो, अविज्ञातो विजानन्—‘सर्वाणि रूपाणि विचित्य धीरो नामानि कृत्वाऽभिवदन् यदास्ते’ इति। अस्मिन्नर्थे श्रुतयः सहस्रशः ‘तत्सृष्ट्वा तदेवानुप्राविशत्’, ‘अन्तः प्रविष्टः शास्ता जनानाम्’, ‘स एष इह प्रविष्टः’, ‘एष त आत्मा’, ‘स एतमेव सीमानं विदार्यैतया द्वारा प्रापद्यत’, ‘एष सर्वेषु भूतेषु गूढोत्मा’, ‘सेयं देवतैक्षत हन्ताहमिमास्तिस्रो देवताः’ इत्याद्याः ॥ २३ ॥ 23. “You said, ‘How am I devoid of birth, lineage and sanctifying ceremonies which are different (from the Self ?)’ Listen. The same one who is the cause of the unfoldment of name and form, whose nature is different from that of name and form, and who is devoid of all connection with sanctifying ceremonies, evolved name and form, created this body and entered into it (which is but name and form)—who is Himself the unseen seer, the unheard listener, the unthought thinker, the unknown knower as stated in the Sruti text, ‘(I ¹ know) who creates names and forms and remains speaking’. There are thousands of Sruti texts conveying the same meaning; for instance, ‘He ² created and entered into it,’ ‘Entering ³ into them He rules all creatures,’ ‘He,⁴ the Self, has entered into these bodies,’ ‘This ⁵ is your Self,’ ‘Opening ⁶ this very suture of the Skull He got in by that door,’ ‘This ⁷ Self is concealed in all beings,’ ‘That ⁸ Divinity thought—let me enter into these three deities.’ ¹ T. Â., 3. 12. 7.      ² Tai. U., 2. 6.      ³ T. Â., 3. 11. 1, 2. ⁴ Br. U., 1. 4. 7.      ⁵ Br. U., 3. 4. 1.      ⁶ Ai. U., 1. 3. 12. ⁷ Kath. U., 3. 12.      ⁸ Chh. U., 6. 3. 2.

16 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS स्मृतयोऽपि ‘आत्मैव देवताः सर्वाः’, ‘नवद्वारे पुरे देही’, क्षेत्रज्ञं चापि मां विद्धि’, ‘समः सर्वेषु भूतेषु’, ‘उपद्रष्टानुमन्ता च’, ‘उत्तमः पुरुषस्त्वन्यः’, ‘अशरीरं शरीरेषु’ इत्याद्याः । तस्मात् जात्यन्वयसंस्कारवर्जितस्त्वमिति सिद्धम् ॥ २४ ॥ 24. “Smriti texts too elucidate the same truth ; for ex- ample, ‘All¹ gods verily are the Self,’ ‘The Self² in the city of nine gates,’ ‘Know³ the individual Self to be Myself’, ‘The same⁴ in all beings,’ ‘The witness⁵ and approver,’ ‘The Supreme⁶ Being is different,’ ‘Residing in⁷ all bodies but Itself devoid of any,’ and so on. Therefore it is established that you are without any connection with birth, lineage and sanctifying cere- monies.” स यदि ब्रूयात्—अन्य एवाहमज्ञः सुखी दुःखी बद्धः संसारी, अन्योऽसौ मद्विलक्षणः असंसारी देवः, तमहं बल्युप- हारनमस्कारादिभिः वर्णाश्रमकर्मभिश्चाराध्य संसारसागरादुत्ति- तीर्षुरस्मि, कथमहं स एवेति ॥ २५ ॥ 25. If he says, “I am in bondage, liable to trans- migration, ignorant, (sometimes) happy, (sometimes) unhappy and am entirely different from Him. He, the shining One who is dissimilar in nature to me and beyond transmigratory existence is also different from me. I want to worship Him through the actions pertaining to my caste and order of life by making presents and offerings to Him and also by making ¹ Manu, XII. 119. ² Bh. Gîtâ, 5. 13. ³ Bh. Gîtâ, 13. 2. ⁴ Bh. Gîtâ, 13. 27. ⁵ Bh. Gîtâ, 13. 22. ⁶ Bh. Gîtâ, 15. 17. ⁷ Kath. U., 2. 22, but the Smriti source untraced.

A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE 17 salutations and the like. I am eager to cross the ocean of the world in this way. So how am I He Himself?" आचार्यो ब्रूयात्—नैवं सोम्य प्रतिपत्तुमर्हसि, प्रतिषिद्ध- त्वाद्भेदप्रतिपत्तेः। कथं प्रतिषिद्धा भेदप्रतिपत्तिरित्यत आह— 'अन्योऽसावन्योऽहमस्मीति न स वेद', 'ब्रह्म तं परादाद्यो- ऽन्यत्रात्मनो ब्रह्म वेद', 'मृत्योः स मृत्युमाप्नोति य इह नानेव पश्यति' इत्येवमाद्याः ॥ २६ ॥ 26. The teacher should say, "You ought not, my child, regard it so; because a doctrine of difference is forbidden." In reply to the question, 'Why is it for- bidden?' the following other Sruti texts may be cited : "He$^1$ who knows that Brahman is one and he is another does not know (Brahman)", "He$^2$ who regards the Brâhmanical caste as different from himself is rejected$^3$ by that caste." "One$^4$ who views Brahman as if having diversity in It goes from death to death", and so on. एता एव श्रुतयो भेदप्रतिपत्तेः संसारगमनं दर्शयन्ति ॥ २७ ॥ 27. These Srutis show that transmigratory existence is the sure result of the acceptance of (the reality of) difference. अभेदप्रतिपत्तेश्च मोक्षं दर्शयन्ति सहस्रशः—'स आत्मा तत्त्वमसि' इति परमात्मभावं विधाय 'आचार्यवान् पुरुषो वेद' इत्युक्त्वा 'तस्य तावदेव चिरम्' इति मोक्षं दर्शयन्त्यभेदविज्ञा- $^1$ Br. U., 1. 4. 10. $^2$ Br. U., 2. 4. 6. $^3$ Makes him disinclined to $^4$ Br. U., 4, 4. 19. know Brahman. 2

18 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS नादेव । सत्याभिसन्धस्य अतस्करस्येव दाहाद्यभाववत् संसारा- भावं दर्शयन्ति दृष्टान्तेन, भेददर्शनादसत्याभिसन्धस्य संसार- गमनं दर्शयन्ति तस्करस्येव दाहादिदृष्टान्तेन ॥ २८ ॥ 28. " That, on the other hand, liberation results from the acceptance of (the reality of) non-difference is borne out by thousands of Śrutis; for example, after teaching that the individual Self is not different from the supreme One in the text, " That ¹ is the Self, thou art That', and after saying, ' A ² man who has a teacher knows Brahman' the Śrutis prove liberation to be the result of the knowledge of (the reality of) non-difference only, by saying ' A ³ knower of Brahman has to wait only so long as he is not merged in Brahman'. That transmigratory existence comes to an absolute cessation, (in the case of one who speaks the truth that difference has no real existence), is illustrated by the example of one ⁴ who was not a thief and did not get burnt (by grasping a heated hatchet ;) and that one, speaking what is not true (i.e. the reality of difference), continues to be in the mundane condition is illustrated by the example of a thief who got burnt. 'त इह व्याघ्रो वा' इत्यादिना च अभेददर्शनात् 'स स्वराट् भवति' इत्युक्त्वा तद्विपरीतेन भेददर्शनेन संसारगमनं दर्शयन्ति—'अथ येऽन्यथाऽतो विदुरन्यराजानस्ते क्षय्यलोका भवन्ति' इति प्रतिशाखम् । तस्मान्मृषैवैवमवादीः—ब्राह्मण- पुत्रोऽदोन्वयः संसारी परमात्मविलक्षण इति ॥ २९ ॥ ¹ Chh. U., 6. 13. 3. ² Chh. U., 6. 14. 2. ³ Chh. U., 6. 14. 2. ⁴ Chh. U., 6. 16. 1—3.

A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE 19 29. "The Sruti text commencing with 'Whatever¹ these creatures are here, whether a tiger or' and similar other texts, after asserting that 'One² becomes one's own master (i.e. Brahman)' by the knowledge of (the reality of) non-difference, show that one continues to remain in the transmigratory condition in the opposite case as the result of the acceptance of (the reality of) difference, saying, 'Knowing³ differently from this they get other beings for their masters and reside in perish- able regions'. Such statements are found in every branch of the Veda. It was, therefore, certainly wrong on your part to say that you were the son of a Brâh- mana, that you belonged to such and such a lineage, that you were subject to transmigration and that you were different from the supreme Self. तस्मात् प्रतिषिद्धत्वाद्भेददर्शनस्य, भेदविषयत्वाच्च कर्मोपा- दानस्य, कर्मसाधनत्वाच्च यज्ञोपवीतादेः कर्मसाधनोपादानस्य परमात्माभेदप्रतिपत्त्या प्रतिषेधः कृतो वेदितव्यः । कर्मणां तत्साधनानां च यज्ञोपवीतादीनां परमात्माभेदप्रतिपत्तिविरुद्ध- त्वात् । संसारिणो हि कर्माणि विधीयन्ते तत्साधनानि च यज्ञोपवीतादीनि, न परमात्मनोऽभेददर्शिनः । भेददर्शनमात्रेण च ततोऽन्यत्वम् ॥ ३० ॥ 30. "As the acceptance of (the reality of) difference s forbidden, it should be understood that, on the know- ledge of one's identity with the supreme Self, the under- taking of religious rites which have difference for their ¹ Chh. U., 6. 9. 3. ² Chh. U., 6. 25. 2. ³ Chh. U., 7. 25. 2.

20 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS province and the assumption of yajnopavîta ¹ etc., which are the means to their performance, are forbidden. For these rites and yajnopavîta etc., their means, are incon- sistent with the knowledge of one's identity with the supreme Self. It is on those people only that refer classes and orders of life etc., to the Self that Vedic actions and yajnopavîta etc., their means, are enjoined, but not on those who have acquired the knowledge of their identity with the supreme Self. That ² one is other than Brahman is due only to the acceptance of (the reality of) difference. यदि कर्माणि कर्तव्यानि, न निवर्तयिषितानि, कर्मसाधना- सम्बन्धिनः कर्मनिमित्तजात्याश्रमाद्यसम्बन्धिनश्च परमात्मनश्च आत्मनैवाभेदप्रतिपत्तिं नावक्ष्यत् 'स आत्मा तत्त्वमसि' इत्येव- मादिभिर्निश्चितरूपैर्वाक्यैः, भेदप्रतिपत्तिनिन्दां च नाभ्यधास्यत् 'एष नित्यो महिमा ब्राह्मणस्य', 'अनन्वागतं पुण्येनानन्वागतं पापेन, अत्र स्तेनोऽस्तेनः' इत्यादिना ॥ ३१ ॥ 31. "If Vedic rites were to be performed and not meant to be renounced, the Sruti would neither have dec- lared the identity of oneself with the supreme Self un- related to those rites, their means, castes, orders of life, etc., which are the conditions ³ of Vedic actions, in unambiguous sentences like 'That ⁴ is the Self, thou art ¹ The holy thread worn by the first three classes of the Hindus— the Brâhmanas, the Kshatriyas, and the Vaishyas. ² This is said in reply to the objection viz., why are duties enjoin- ed only on the ignorant as they are also not different from Brahman? ³ Those only who belong to castes or orders of life are fit for Vedic actions. ⁴ Chh. U., 6. 8. 7.

A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE 21 That ; ' nor would it have condemned the acceptance of (the reality of) difference in clauses such as ' It ¹ is the eternal glory of the knower of Brahman,' ' Untouched ² by virtue, untouched by sin', and ' Here ³ a thief is no thief.' कर्मासम्बन्धिस्वरूपत्वं कर्मनिमित्तवर्णाद्यसम्बन्धरूपतां च नाभ्यधास्यत्, कर्माणि च कर्मसाधनानि च यज्ञोपवीतादीनि यद्यपरितित्याजयिषितानि । तस्मात् ससाधनं कर्म परित्यक्तव्यं मुमुक्षुणा, परमात्माऽभेददर्शनविरोधात्, आत्मा च पर एवेति प्रतिपत्तव्यो यथाश्रुत्युक्तलक्षणः ॥ ३२ ॥ 32. "The Srutis would not have stated that the essential nature of the Self was in no way connected with Vedic rites and conditions required by them such as a particular class, and the rest, if they did not intend that those rites and yajnopavîta etc., their means, should be given up. Therefore, Vedic actions which are in- compatible with the knowledge of the identity of one- self with the supreme Self should be renounced together with their means by one who aspires after liberation ; and it should be known that the Self is no other than Brahman as defined in the Srutis." स यदि ब्रूयात्—भगवन्, दह्यमाने छिद्यमाने वा देहे प्रत्यक्षा वेदना, अशनायादिनिमित्तं च प्रत्यक्षं दुःखं मम । परश्चायमात्मा, ‘ अयमात्माऽपहतपाप्मा विजरो विमृत्युर्विशोको विजिघत्सोऽपि- पासः सर्वगन्धरसवर्जितः ' इति श्रूयते सर्वश्रुतिषु स्मृतिषु च । ¹ Br. U., 4. 4. 23. ² Br. U., 4. 3. 22. ³ Br, U., 4. 3. 22.

22 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS कथं तद्विलक्षणः अनेकसंसारधर्मसंयुक्तः परमात्मानमात्मत्वेन च मां संसारिणं परमात्मत्वेन अग्निमिव शीतत्वेन प्रतिपद्येयम् ? संसारी च सन् सर्वाभ्युदयनिःश्रेयससाधने अधिकृतः अभ्यु- दयनिःश्रेयससाधनानि कर्माणि तत्साधनानि च यज्ञोपवीतादीनि कथं परित्यजेयमिति ॥ ३३ ॥ 33. If he says, “ The pain due to burns or cuts in the body and the misery caused by hunger and the like, Sir, are distinctly perceived to be in me. The supreme Self is known in all the Srutis and the Smritis to be ‘ free $^{1}$ from sin, old age, death, grief, hunger, thirst, etc., and devoid of smell and taste ’. How can I who am different from Him and possess so many phenomenal attributes possibly accept the supreme Self as myself and myself, a transmigratory being, as the supreme Self ? I may them very well admit that fire is cool ! Why should I, a man of the world entitled to accomplish all prosperity in this world and in the next and realize the supreme end of life, i.e., liberation, give up the actions producing those results and yajnopavîta etc., their accessories ? ” तं प्रति ब्रूयात्—यदवोचो दह्यमाने छिद्यमाने वा देहे प्रत्यक्षा वेदनोपलभ्यते ममेति तदसत् । कस्मात् ? दह्यमाने छिद्यमान इव वृक्षे उपलब्धुरुपलभ्यमाने कर्मणि शरीरे दाहच्छेदवेदनाया उप- लभ्यमानत्वात् दाहादिसमानाश्रयैव वेदना । यत्र हि दाहः छेदो वा क्रियते तत्रैव व्यपदिशति दाहादिवेदनां लोकः, न वेदनां दाहाद्युपलब्धरीति । कथं ? क ते वेदनेति पृष्टः शिरसि $^{1}$ Chh. U., 8. 7. 1.

A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE 23 मे वेदना उरसि उदरे इति वा यत्र दाहादिस्तत्रैव व्यपदि- शति, न तूपलब्धरीति । यद्युपलब्धरि वेदना स्यात्, वेदनानिमित्तं वा दाहच्छेदादि, वेदनाश्रयत्वेनोपदिशेद्दाहा- द्याश्रयवत् ॥ ३४ ॥ 34. The teacher should say to him, “ It was not right for you to say, ‘ I directly perceive the pain in me when my body gets cuts or burns ’. Why ? Because the pain due to cuts or burns, perceived in the body,¹ the object of the perception of the perceiver like a tree burnt or cut, must have the same location as the burns etc. People point out pain caused by burns and the like to be in that place where they occur but not in the perceiver. How ? For, on being asked where one's pain lies, one says, ‘ I have pain in the head, in the chest or in the stomach ’. Thus one points out pain in that place where burns or cuts occur, but never in the perceiver. If pain or its causes viz., burns or cuts were in the perceiver one would have pointed out the per- ceiver to be the seat of the pain, like the parts of the body, the seats of the burns or cuts. स्वयं च नोपलभ्येत चक्षुर्गतद्रूपवत् । तस्मात् दाहच्छेदादि- समानाश्रयत्वेन उपलभ्यमानत्वाद्दाहादिवत् कर्मभूतैव वेदना । भावरूपत्वाच्च साश्रया तण्डुलपाकवत् । वेदनासमानाश्नय एव तत्संस्कारः । स्मृतिसमानकाल एवोपलभ्यमानत्वात् वेदना- विषयः । तन्निमित्तविषयश्च द्वेषोऽपि संस्कारसमानाश्नय एव । ¹ Pain is located in the body, it is true, but as a matter of fact it is in the mind.

24 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS तथा चोक्तम्—‘रूपसंस्कारतुल्याऽऽधी रागद्वेषौ भयं च यत् । गृह्यते धीश्रयं तस्माज्ज्ञाता शुद्धोऽभयः सदा’ ॥ ३५ ॥ 35. “Moreover, (if it were in the Self) the pain could not be perceived by the Self like the colour of the eye by the same eye. Therefore, as it is perceived to have the same seat as burns, cuts and the like, pain must be an object of perception like them. Since ¹ it is an effect, it must have a receptacle like that in which rice is cooked. The impressions ² of pain must have the same seat as pain ³ itself. As they are perceived during the time when memory is possible (i.e., in waking and dream, and not in deep sleep), these impressions must have the same location ⁴ as pain. The aversion to cuts, burns and the like, the causes of pain, must also have the same seat ⁵ as the impressions (of pain). It is there- fore said, ‘Desire ⁶, aversion and fear have a seat com- mon with that of the impressions of colours. As they have for their seat the intellect,⁷ the knower, the Self, is always pure and devoid of fear.’ किमाश्रयाः पुना रूपादि संस्कारादय इति । उच्यते । यत्र कामादयः । क्व पुनस्ते कामादयः ? ‘कामः सङ्कल्पो विचि- ¹ This sentence is an answer to the objection that pain cannot be in the body which is non-conscious ; nor can it be in the Self which has been shown to be free from it ; so pain has no location at all. ² This is in reply to the objection viz, ‘Let the Self be the recep- tacle as the impressions and memory etc. of pain are perceived in the Self.’ ³ Pain being proved to be not in the Self, its impressions also cannot be there. ⁴ And therefore it is not the Self. ⁵ i.e., the non- Self. ⁶ Verse 13, chapter 15 of this book. ⁷ The intellect (and not the Self) is the seat of all other feelings also.

A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE 25

कित्सा ’ इत्यादिश्रुतेः बुद्धावेव । तत्रैव रूपादिसंस्कारादयोऽपि, ‘कस्मिन्नु रूपाणि प्रतिष्ठितानीति हृदये’ इति श्रुतेः । ‘कामा येऽस्य हृदि श्रिताः ’, ‘तीर्णो हि तदा सर्वान् शोकान् हृद- यस्य’, ‘असङ्गो ह्ययम्’, ‘तद्वा अस्यैतदतिच्छन्दाः ’ इत्यादि- श्रुतिभ्यः, ‘अविकार्योऽयमुच्यते’, ‘अनादित्वान्निर्गुणत्वात् ’ इत्यादि इच्छाद्वेषादि च क्षेत्रस्यैव विषयस्य धर्मो नात्मन इति स्मृतिभ्यश्च कर्मस्थैवाशुद्धिः नात्मस्था इति ॥ ३६ ॥

36. ‘“What is then the locus of the impressions of colours and the rest ?” ‘The same as that of lust etc.’ ‘Where again are lust etc. ?’ They are in the intellect (and no where else) according to the Sruti,¹ ‘lust, deli- beration, doubt.’ The impressions of colours and so forth are also there (and nowhere else) according to the Sruti, ‘what ² is the seat of colours ? The intellect.’ That desire, aversion and the like are the attributes of the embodiment, the object and not of the Self, is known from the Srutis, ‘Desires ³ that are in the intellect,’ ‘For ⁴ he is then beyond all the woes of his heart (intellect) ’, ‘Because ⁵ It is unattached,’ and ‘Its ⁶ form untouched by desires ’ and also from Smritis such as ‘It ⁷ is said to be changeless,’ ‘Because ⁸ It is beginningless and without attributes’ and so on. Therefore (it is concluded that) impurity pertains to the object and not to the Self.

अतो रूपादिसंस्काराद्यशुद्धिसंबन्धाभावात् न परस्मादात्मनो विलक्षणस्त्वमिति प्रत्यक्षादिविरोधाभावात् युक्तं पर एवात्माऽह-

¹ Br. U., 1. 5. 3.    ² Br. U., 3. 9. 20.    ³ Br. U., 4. 4. 7. ⁴ Br. U., 4. 3. 22.    ⁵ Br. U., 4. 3. 16.    ⁶ Br. U., 4. 3. 21. ⁷ Bh. Gîtâ, 2. 25.    ⁸ Bh. Gîtâ, 13. 31.

26 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS मिति प्रतिपत्तुम्—'तदात्मानमेवावेदहं ब्रह्मास्मि', 'एकधैवानु- द्रष्टव्यम्', 'अहमेवाधस्तात्', 'आत्मैवाधस्तात्', 'सर्वमा- त्मानं पश्यति', 'यत्र त्वस्य सर्वमात्मैव', 'इदं सर्वं यदयमा- त्मा', 'स एषोऽकलः', 'अनन्तरमबाह्यम्', 'सबाह्याभ्यन्तरो ह्यजः', 'ब्रह्मैवेदम्', 'एतया द्वारा प्रापद्यत', 'प्रज्ञानस्य नामधेयानि', 'सत्यं ज्ञानमनन्तं ब्रह्म', 'तस्माद्वा', 'तत्सृष्ट्वा तदेवानुप्राविशत्', 'एको देवः सर्वभूतेषु गूढः सर्वव्यापी', 'अशरीरं शरीरेषु', 'न जायते म्रियते', 'स्वप्नान्तं जागरिता- न्तम्', 'स म आत्मेति विद्यात्', 'यस्तु सर्वाणि भूतानि', 'तदेजति तन्नैजति', 'वेनस्तत्पश्यन्', 'तदेवाग्निः', 'अहं मनुरभवं सूर्यश्च', 'अन्तः प्रविष्टः शास्ता जनानाम्', 'सदेव सोम्य', 'तत्सत्यं स आत्मा तत्त्वमसि' इत्यादिश्श्रुतिभ्यः ॥३७॥ स्मृतिभ्यश्च—'पूः प्राणिनः सर्वगुहाशयस्य', 'आत्मैव देव- ताः', 'नवद्वारे पुरे', 'समं सर्वेषु भूतेषु', 'विद्याविनयसंपन्ने', 'अविभक्तं विभक्तेषु', 'वासुदेवः सर्वम्' इत्यादिभ्यः एक एवात्मा परं ब्रह्म सर्वसंसारधर्मविनिर्मुक्तस्त्वमिति सिद्धम् ॥३८॥ 37, 38. "Therefore you are not different from the supreme Self inasmuch as you are devoid of impurities such as the connection with the impressions of colours and the like. As there is no contradiction to percep- tional evidence etc. the supreme Self should be accepted as oneself according to the Srutis, 'It ¹ knew the pure Self to be Brahman,' 'It ² should be regarded as homo- geneous,' 'It ³ is I that am below,' 'It ⁴ is the Self that is below,' 'He ⁵ knows everything to be the Self,' 'When ⁶ ¹ Br. U., 1. 4. 10. ² Br. U., 4. 4. 20 ³ Chh. U., 7. 25. 1. ⁴ Chh. U., 7. 25. 2. ⁵ Br. U., 4. 4. 23. ⁶ Br. U., 2. 4. 14.

A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE 27 everything becomes the Self,' 'All¹ this verily is the Self,' 'He² is without parts,' 'Without³ the interior and exterior,' 'Unborn,⁴ comprising the interior and exterior,' 'All⁵ this verily is Brahman,' 'It⁶ entered through this door,' 'The⁷ names of pure knowledge,' 'Existence,⁸ Knowledge, Infinite Brahman,' 'From⁹ It,' 'It¹⁰ created and entered it,' 'The¹¹ shining One without a second, concealed in all beings and all-pervad- ing,' 'In¹² all bodies Itself bodiless,' 'It¹³ is not born and does not die,' '(Knowing,) dream¹⁴ and waking,' 'He¹⁵ is my Self, thus one should know,' 'Who¹⁶ (knows) all beings,' 'It¹⁷ moves and moves not,' 'know- ing¹⁸ It, one becomes worthy of being worshipped,' 'It¹⁹ and nothing but It is fire,' 'I²⁰ became Manu and the sun,' 'Entering²¹ into them He rules all creatures,' 'Existence²² only, my child' and 'That²³ is real, That is the Self, thou art That.' "It is established that you, the Self, are the supreme Brahman, the One only and devoid of every pheno- menal attribute from the Smritis also such as, 'All²⁴ beings are the body of One who resides in the hearts of all,' 'Gods²⁵ are verily the Self,' 'In²⁶ the city of nine gates,' 'The²⁷ same in all beings,' 'In²⁸ a Brâhmaṇa ¹ Br. U., 2. 4. 6. ² Pra. U., 6. 5. ³ Br. U., 2. 5. 19. ⁴ Mu. U., 2. 1. 2. ⁵ Mu. U., 2. 2. 11. ⁶ Ai. U., 1, 3. 12. ⁷ Ai. U., 3. 1. 2. ⁸ Tai. U., 2. 1. 1. ⁹ Tai. U., 2. 1, 1. ¹⁰ Tai., U., 2. 1. 6 ¹¹ Sw. U., 6. 11. ¹² Kath. U., 2. 22. ¹³ Kath. U., 2. 18. ¹⁴ Kath. U., 2. 1. 4. ¹⁵ Kaushîtak. U., III. 8. ¹⁶ Îsh. U., 6. ¹⁷ Îsh. U., 5. ¹⁸ M. N. U., 2. 3. ¹⁹ T. Â., 10. 1. ²⁰ Br. U., 1. 4. 10. ²¹ T. Â., 3. 11. 1. 2. ²² Chh. U., 6. 2. 1. ²³ Chh. U., 6. 8. 7. ²⁴ Âpastamba Dharma ²⁵ Manu, XII. 119. ²⁶ Bh. Gîtâ, 5. 13. Sûtra 1. 8. 22. ²⁷ Bh. Gîtâ, 13. 27. ²⁸ Bh. Gîtâ, 5. 18.

28 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS wise and courteous', 'Undivided ¹ in things divided' and 'All ² this verily is Vâsudeva (the Self).' " स यदि ब्रूयात्—यदि भगवन् 'अनन्तरोऽबाह्यः', 'सबाह्या- भ्यन्तरो ह्यजः', 'कृत्स्नः', 'प्रज्ञानघन एव' सैन्धवघनवदात्मा सर्वमूर्तिभेदवर्जितः आकाशवदेकरसः, तर्हि किमिदं दृश्यते श्रूयते वा साध्यं साधनं वा साधकश्चेति श्रुतिस्मृतिलोकप्रसिद्धं वादि- शतविप्रतिपत्तिविषय इति ॥ ३९ ॥ 39. If he says "If, Sir, the Self is 'Without ³ interior or exterior,' 'Comprising ⁴ the interior and exterior, un- born,' 'Whole,' 'Pure consciousness only' like a lump of salt, devoid of all the various forms, and of a homoge- neous nature like the ether, what is it that is observed in ordinary usage and revealed in Śrutis and Smritis as what is to be accomplished, its (appropriate) means and its accomplishers, and is made the subject-matter of contention among hundreds of rival disputants hold- ing different views?" आचार्यो ब्रूयात्—अविद्याकृतमेतद्यदिदं दृश्यते श्रूयते वा, परमार्थतस्त्वेक एवात्मा अविद्यादृष्टेः अनेकवत् आभासते, तिमि- रदृष्ट्या अनेकचन्द्रवत् । 'यत्र वा अन्यदिव स्यात्', 'यत्र हि द्वैतमिव भवति तदितर इतरं पश्यति', 'मृत्योः स मृत्युमा- प्नोति', 'अथ यत्रान्यत्पश्यति अन्यच्छृणोति अन्यद्विजानाति तदल्पम्, अथ यदल्पं तन्मर्त्यमिति', 'वाचारम्भणं विकारो नामधेयं मृत्तिकेत्येव सत्यम्', 'अन्योऽसावन्योऽहम्' इति भेद- ¹ Bh. Gîtâ, 13. 16. ² Bh. Gîtâ, 7. 19. ³ Br. U., 2. 5. 19. ⁴ Mu. U., 2. 1. 2.

A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE 29 दर्शननिन्दोपपत्तेरविद्याकृतं द्वैतम् ‘एकमेवाद्वितीयम्’, ‘यत्र त्वस्य’, ‘तत्र को मोहः कः शोकः’ इत्याद्येकत्वविधिश्रुति- भ्यश्चेति ॥ ४० ॥ 40. The teacher should say “Whatever is observed (in this world) or learnt from the Srutis (regarding the next world) are products of Ignorance. But in reality there is only One, the Self who appears to be many to deluded vision, like the moon appearing to be more than one to eyes affected by amaurosis. That duality is the product of Ignorance follows from the reasonableness of the condemnation by the Srutis of the acceptance of (the reality of) difference such as, ‘When¹ there is something else as it were,’ ‘When² there is duality as it were, one sees another,’ ‘He³ goes from death to death,’ ‘And⁴ where one sees something else, hears something else, cognizes something else, that is finite, and that which is finite is mortal,’ ‘Modifica- tions⁵ (i.e., effects e.g., earthen jars) being only names, have for their support words only, it is earth alone (i.e., the cause) that is real’ and ‘He⁶ is one, I am another.’ The same thing follows from the Srutis teach- ing unity, for example, ‘One⁷ only without a second,’ ‘When⁸ the knower of Brahman’ and ‘What⁹ delusion or grief is there?’” यद्येवं भगवन्, किमर्थं श्रुत्या साध्यसाधनादिभेद उच्यते उत्पत्तिः प्रलयश्चेति ॥ ४१ ॥ ¹ Br. U., 4. 3. 31. ² Br. U., 2. 4. 14. ³ Br. U., 4. 4. 19. ⁴ Chh. U., 7. 24. 1. ⁵ Chh. U., 6. 1. 4. ⁶ Br. U., 1. 4. 10. ⁷ Chh. U., 6. 2. 1. ⁸ Br. U., 4. 5. 15. ⁹ Îsh. U., 7.

30 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS 41. “If it be so, Sir, why do the Srutis speak of diverse ends to be attained, their means, and so forth, as also the evolution and the dissolution of the universe ? ” अत्रोच्यते—अविद्यावत उपात्तशरीरादिभेदस्य इष्टानिष्टयोगि- नमात्मानं मन्यमानस्य साधनैरेवेष्टानिष्टप्राप्तिपरिहारोपायविवेकम्- जानतः इष्टप्राप्तिं चानिष्टपरिहारं चेच्छतः शनैस्तद्विषयमज्ञानं निवर्तयितुं शास्त्रं न साध्यसाधनादिभेदं विधत्ते । अनिष्टरूपः संसारो हि स इति तद्भेददृष्टिमेवाविद्यां संसारमुन्मूलयति उत्पत्ति- प्रलयाद्येकत्वोपपत्तिप्रदर्शनेन ॥ ४२ ॥ 42. “The answer to your question is this : Having acquired (i.e. having identified himself with) the various things such as the body etc. and considering the Self to be connected with what is desirable and what is undesirable and so on, though eager to attain the desir- able and avoid the undesirable by appropriate means— for without certain means nothing can be accomplished— an ignorant man cannot discriminate between the means to the realisation of what is (really ¹) desirable for him and the means to the avoidance of what is undesirable. It is the gradual removal ² of this ignorance that is the aim of the scriptures ; but not the enunciation of (the reality of) the difference of the end, means and so on. For it is this very difference that constitutes this undesirable transmigratory existence. The scriptures, therefore, root out the ignorance constituting this (false) conception of difference which is the cause of phenomenal existence ¹ Self-knowledge. ² Through the injunction of meritorious actions for the purification of the mind.

A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE 31 by giving reasons for the oneness ¹ of the evolution, dissolution, etc. of the universe. अविद्यायामुन्मूलितायां श्रुतिस्मृतिन्यायेभ्यः अनन्तरमबा- ह्यम्, सबाह्याभ्यन्तरो ह्यजः, सैन्धवघनवत् प्रज्ञानघन एवैक आत्मा, आकाशवत्परिपूर्णः इत्यत्रैव एका प्रज्ञाप्रतिष्ठा परमार्थ- दर्शिनो भवति, न साध्यसाधनोत्पत्तिप्रलयादिभेदेन अशुद्धिगन्धो- ऽप्युपपद्यते ॥ ४३ ॥ 43. "When ignorance is uprooted with the aid of the Śruti, Smriti and reasoning the one-pointed ² intellect of the seer of the supreme Truth becomes established ³ in the one Self consisting of pure Consciousness like a (homogeneous) lump of salt and all-pervading ⁴ like the ether, which is within and without, without the interior or exterior and unborn. Even the slightest taint of impurity due to the diversity of ends, means, evolution, dissolu- tion and the rest is, therefore, not reasonable. तच्चैतत् परमार्थदर्शनं प्रतिपत्तुमिच्छता वर्णाश्रमाद्यभिमान- कृतपाङ्क्तरूपपुत्रवित्तलोकैषणादिभ्यो व्युत्थानं कर्तव्यम् । सम्य- क्प्रत्ययविरोधात्तदभिमानस्य भेददर्शनप्रतिषेधार्थोपपत्तिश्चोपपद्यते । नह्येकस्मिन्नात्मन्यसंसारित्वबुद्धौ शास्त्रन्यायोत्पादितायां तद्वि- परीता बुद्धिर्भवति । नह्यग्नौ शीतत्वबुद्धिः, शरीरे वा अज- रामरणबुद्धिः । तस्मादविद्याकार्यत्वात् सर्वकर्मणां तत्साधनानां च यज्ञोपवीतादीनां परमार्थदर्शननिष्ठेन त्यागः कर्तव्यः ॥ ४४ ॥ ¹ By showing that the universe is not different from Brahman. ² Bh. Gîtâ, 2. 41. ³ Bh. Gîtâ, 2. 55. ⁴ Just as a rope pervades the snake mistaken for it.

32 A THOUSAND TEACHINGS 44. "One, eager to realize this right Knowledge spoken of in the Sruti, should rise above the desire for a son, wealth and this ¹ world and the next which are described in a five-fold ² manner and are the outcome of a false reference to the Self of castes, orders of life and so on. As this reference is contradictory to right Knowledge it is intelligible why reasons are given ³ regarding the prohibition of the acceptance of (the reality of) difference. For when the Knowledge that the one non-dual Self is beyond phenomenal existence is generated by the scriptures and reasoning there cannot exist (side by side with it) a knowledge contrary to it. None can think of chillness in fire or immortality and freedom from old age in regard to the (perishable) body. One, therefore, who is eager to be established in the Knowledge of the Reality should give up all actions ⁴ with yajnopavīta and the rest, their accessories, which are the effects of ignorance." HERE ENDS A METHOD OF ENLIGHTENING THE DISCIPLE ¹ See foot-notes 1 and 2 on para 2 above. ² Br. U., 1. 4. 17. ³ by the Srutis. ⁴ Obligatory daily duties enjoined by the Vedas occasional rites, rites performed for some particular object and with a view to future fruition and actions prohibited by the Vedas.

कूटस्थाद्वयात्मबोधप्रकरणम् ॥ २ ॥ CHAPTER II THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE CHANGELESS AND NON-DUAL SELF सुखमासीनं ब्राह्मणं ब्रह्मनिष्ठं कश्चिद्ब्रह्मचारी जन्ममरणलक्ष- णात् संसारात् निर्विण्णो मुमुक्षुः विधिवदुपसन्नः पप्रच्छ— भगवन्, कथमहं संसारान्मोक्षिष्ये ? शरीरेन्द्रियविषयवेदनावान् जागरिते दुःखमनुभवामि, तथा स्वप्नेऽनुभवामि पुनः पुनः सुषुप्ति- प्रतिपत्त्या विश्रम्य विश्रम्य । किमयमेव मम स्वभावः, किं वा अन्यस्वभावस्य सतो नैमित्तिक इति । यदि स्वभावः, न मे मोक्षाशा, स्वभावस्यावर्जनीयत्वात् । अथ नैमित्तिकः, निमित्त- परिहारे स्यान्मोक्षोपपत्तिः ॥ ४५ ॥ 45. A certain Brahmachârin,¹ tired of the transmigra- tory existence consisting of birth and death and aspiring after liberation, approached in the prescribed manner² a Knower of Brahman established in It and sitting at ease and said, " How can I, Sir, be liberated from this ¹ One belonging to the first of the four orders of life, a student. ² Bh. Gîtâ, 4. 34. 3