वैयाकरण सिद्धान्त कौमुदी (भट्टोजि दीक्षित - बालमनोरमा व तत्त्वबोधिनी टीका सम्पूर्ण पूर्वार्ध)

क्षाः ॥ स्त्रियां नान्तलक्षणे ङीपि भत्वाट्टिलोपः । सुपथी । सुमती । नगरी ।" Wait:

• "एवं मन्थाः ।"
• "ऋभुक्षाः ॥" -> wait, does it have '४' footnote marker? Let's look between ऋभुक्षाः and ॥: It says "ऋभुक्षाः ॥" - wait, where was footnote 4? Look at footnote 4: "४ अत्रैव दीर्घकारविधानेन..." Is marker 4 at "ऋभुक्षाः"? Wait, look at L7: "एवं मन्थाः । ऋभुक्षाः ॥" Wait, is there a small '४' above or near "ऋभुक्षाः"? Yes, there's a small digit 4 near ऋभुक्षाः, or maybe not visible clearly, but the footnote is 4. Wait, let's look at "सुपथी । सुमती । नगरी ।": Wait! Is it "सुमती" or "सुमथी"? मथिन् -> सुमथिन् -> feminine with ङीप् -> भत्वात् टिलोपः -> सुमथी! Yes! It is "सुमथी"! Not सुमती! Look at the letter: म (ma) + थी (thii) = सुमथी! "सुपथी । सुमथी । नगरी ।" - wait, is it "नगरी"? Wait, pathin, mathin, rib