पञ्चसिद्धान्तिका (आचार्य वराहमिहिर - सूर्य, रोमक, पौलिश, वासिष्ठ एवं पितामह सिद्धान्त)

भूपरिधिखण्डवर्गो देशान्तरयोजनैः कृतस्तेन। तदतीव गणितजाड्यं प्रदर्शितं जिष्णुतनयेन॥२५॥ नातोऽस्ति ज्या नियमः शरसौक्ष्म्यात्तन्निवर्तनं युक्तम्। सप्तक (७) शरे निवृत्तिर्जिष्णुसुतस्यैव युक्ततमा॥३१॥ प्राक् क्षितिजेऽपमवलयोदयमानं प्राङ् निरूपितं दृष्टम्। जिष्णुसुतेनान्यत्र तु नातो जानाति तद् भ्रमणम्॥३६॥ वास्तववेधादन्यज्जिष्णोस्तनयस्य भाविनी भाऽपि। दूरभ्रष्टाऽङ्गुलकैरतोऽस्फुटास्तस्य सर्वेऽपि॥३७॥ नो वा गोलं नो लम्बनकं संस्थानं नो तथा क्षेत्रम्। नापि रविग्रहहृदयं जिष्णुसुतो गणितगोलबाह्योऽयम्॥४०॥ उदयास्तमयभानोरिष्टे काले ग्रहस्य दृक्कर्म। कृतवान् जिष्णुसुतो यस्त्वौदयिके सुगणितजाड्यं तत्॥४३॥ भानुभुजाविनियोगाच्चन्द्रे शुक्लं प्रदर्शितं तेन। नो लग्नभुजानुगं वेत्ति तु शुक्लं सुतो जिष्णोः॥४४॥ जिष्णुसुतदूषणानां संख्यां वक्तुं न शक्यते यस्मात्। तस्मादयमुद्देशो बुद्धिमताऽन्यानि योज्यानि॥४५॥ एकमपि न वेत्ति जिष्णुसुतो गणित गोलानाम्। न मया प्रोक्तानि ततः पृथक् पृथग् दूषणान्येषाम्॥४६॥ His time is indicated at end of his book- ब्राह्मस्फुटसिद्धान्त (२४/७-८)-श्रीचापवंशतिलके श्रीव्याघ्रमुखे नृपे शकनृपाणाम्। पञ्चाशत् संयुक्तैर्वर्षशतैः पञ्चभिरतीतैः॥ ब्राह्मः स्फुटसिद्धान्तः सज्जनगणितज्ञगोलवित् प्रीत्यै। त्रिंशद्वर्षेण कृतो जिष्णुसुतब्रह्मगुप्तेन॥ Here, year of a king of Chāpa-vamśa is followed who had started a śaka. Gotra of Bhīṣma and Pāṇḍavas was Vyāghrapada of Vasiṣṭha line and a seer of Ṛgveda. Main king in their line whose year was being followed is called Vyāghramukha (i.e head of that line). That was one of the 4 Agni-vamśas joining hand under king Śūdraka at Mount Abu in 756 BC (Śūdraka-śaka). They were Chapahāni, Pratihāra, Paramāra, Chālukya (Solanki, Sālunkhe). In Chapahāni clan, famous king Chāhamāna routed Assyria and its capital Nineve in 612 BC-which was marked by start of a śaka. Thereafter, it was famous as Chauhāna-the last king being Prithviraj Chauhan who was last independent king of Delhi. They were experts in archery or they were protectors of west border of India in shape of Chāpa (bow) called Mālvā-like a garland (mālā). So, they were called Chapahāni. When Saras- vatī river dried up, Hastinapur was destroyed by Ganga floods and Pāṇḍava king Nichakṣu-8 generations after Mahābhārata had to shift to Kosambi. In same generation Pārśvanātha (Jaina Tīrthankara 23) was born in ruling family of Kashi. His sanyāsa time is called Jaina-Yudhiṣṭhira-śaka of 2634 BC. That was era of 100 years without rain (in Sarasvatī river region) when Chapahāni kings protected west border and saved people from famine. That has been called incarnation of Śākambharī in Durgā-saptaśatī, chapter 11. So, Chauhans have been famous as belonging to Śākambharī. भविष्य पुराण, प्रतिसर्ग पर्व (१/६)- एतस्मिन्नेवकाले तु कान्यकुब्जो द्विजोत्तमः। अर्बुदं शिखरं प्राप्य ब्रह्महोममथाकरोत्॥४५॥ वेदमन्त्रप्रभावाच्च जाताश्चत्वारि क्षत्रियाः। प्रमरस्सामवेदी च चपहानिर्यजुर्विदः॥४६॥ त्रिवेदी च तथा शुक्लोऽथर्वा स परिहारकः॥४७॥ अवन्ते प्रमरो भूपश्चतुर्योजन विस्तृता॥४९॥ प्रतिसर्ग (१/७)-चित्रकूटगिरिर्देशे परिहारो महीपतिः। कालिंजर पुरं रम्यमक्रोशायतनं स्मृतम्॥१॥ राजपुत्राख्यदेशे च चपहानिर्महीपतिः॥२॥ अजमेरपुरं रम्यं विधिशोभा समन्वितम्॥३॥ शुक्लो नाम महीपालो गत आनर्तमण्डले। द्वारकां नाम नगरीमध्यास्य सुखिनोऽभवत्॥४॥ विष्णु पुराण (४/२१)-अतः परं भविष्यानहं भूपालान्कीर्तयिष्यामि॥१॥ योऽयं साम्प्रतमवनीपतिः परीक्षित्तस्यापि जनमेजय-श्रुतसेनो-ग्रसेन- भीमसेनश्चत्वारः पुत्राः भविष्यन्ति॥२॥ जनमेजयस्यापि शतानीको भविष्यति॥३॥ योऽसौ याज्ञवल्क्याद्वेदमधीत्य कृपाद्ब्रह्मास्त्रमवाप्य विषम-विषय- विरक्त-चित्तवृत्तिश्च शौनकोपदेशादात्म-ज्ञान-प्रवीणः परं निर्वाणमवाप्स्यति॥४॥ शतानीकादश्वमेधदत्तो भविता॥५॥ तस्मादप्यधिसीमकृष्णः॥६॥ अधिसीमकृष्णान्निचक्षुः॥७॥ यो गङ्गायापहृते हस्तिनापुरे कौशाम्ब्यां निवत्स्यति॥८॥

दुर्गा-सप्तशती (११/४६-४९)-भूयश्च शतवार्षिक्यामनावृष्ट्यामनम्भसि। मुनिभिः संस्तुता भूमौ सम्भविष्याम्ययोनिजा॥४६॥ ततः शतेन नेत्राणां निरीक्षिष्यामि यन्मुनीन्। कीर्तयिष्यन्ति मनुजाः शताक्षीमिति मां ततः॥४७॥ ततोऽहमखिलं लोकमात्मदेहसमुद्भवैः। भरिष्यामि सुराः शाकैरावृष्टेः प्राणधारकैः॥४८॥ शाकम्भरीति विख्यातिं तदा यास्याम्यहं भुवि। तत्रैव च वधिष्यामि दुर्गमाख्यं महासुरम्॥४९॥ जिनविजय महाकाव्य (संस्कृत चन्द्रिका ५/२)-ऋषिवारः तथा पूर्णं मर्त्याक्षौ वाममेलनात् (२०७७), एकीकृत्य लभेताङ्कः क्रोधी स्यात् तत्र वत्सरः। भट्टाचार्य कुमारस्य कर्मकाण्डैकवादिनः, ज्ञेयः प्रादुर्भवस्तस्मिन् वर्षे युधिष्ठिरे शके॥ ऋषि=७, वार =७, पूर्ण =०, मर्त्याक्षौ =२, (जैन) युधिष्ठिर शक (२६३४) से आरम्भ) के २०७७ वर्ष, अर्थात् ५५७ ईसापूर्व में कुमारिल भट्ट का जन्म। दुर्घटना-नन्दः पूर्णं भूः च नेत्रे मनुजानां (२१०९) च वामतः, मेलने वत्सरो धाता युधिष्ठिरशकस्य वै। भट्टाचार्य कुमारस्य कर्मकाण्डैकवादिनः, जातः पराभवस्तस्मिन् विज्ञेयो वत्सरे शुभे॥ मृत्यु-पश्चाद् पश्चादशे वर्षे शंकरस्य गते सति। भट्टाचार्य कुमारस्य दर्शनं कृतवान् शिवः॥ Jiṣṇugupta at time of Vikramāditya is given by Varāhamihira and Kālidāsa- वराहमिहिर- बृहज्जातक सप्तमोऽध्यायः- आयुर्दाय विष्णु (जिष्णु) गुप्तोऽपि चैवं देव स्वामी सिद्धसेनश्च चक्रे। दोषैश्चैषां जायते अष्टावरिष्टं हित्वा नायुर्विंशतेः स्याद् अधस्तात् || ७|| कालिदास-ज्योतिर्विदाभरण-अध्याय २२-ग्रन्थाध्यायनिरूपणम्- श्लोकैश्चतुर्दशशतै सजिनैर्मयैव ज्योतिर्विदाभरणकाव्यविधा नमेतत् ॥ २२.६ ॥ विक्रमार्कवर्णनम्-वर्षे श्रुतिस्मृतिविचारविवेकरम्ये श्रीभारते खधृतिसम्मितदेशपीठे। मत्तोऽधुना कृतिरियं सति मालवेन्द्रे श्रीविक्रमार्कनृपराजवरे समासीत् ॥ २२.७ ॥ **नृपसभायां पण्डितवर्गा-**शङ्कु सुवाग्वररुचिर्मणिरङ्गदत्तो जिष्णुस्त्रिलोचनहरो घटखर्पराख्य। अन्येऽपि सन्ति कवयोऽमरसिंहपूर्वा यस्यैव विक्रमनृपस्य सभासदोऽमो ॥ २२.८ ॥ सत्यो वराहमिहिर श्रुतसेननामा श्रीबादरायणमणित्थकुमारसिंहा। श्रविक्रमार्कनृपसंसदि सन्ति चैते श्रीकालतन्त्रकवयस्त्वपरे मदाद्या ॥ २२.९ ॥ **नवरत्नानि-**धन्वन्तरि क्षपणकामरसिंहशङ्कुर्वेतालभट्टघटखर्परकालिदासा। ख्यातो वराहमिहिरो नृपते सभायां रत्नानि वै वररुचिर्नव विक्रमस्य ॥ २२.१० ॥ Grandfather of Brahmagupta was most famous king Amśuvarman (103-33 BC) of Nepal during whose time Vik- ramāditya had started his samvat at Paśupatinātha in 57 BC. Huensang has described Amśuvarman as a king famous for knowledge who had written a book on grammar. By calculating time of Amśuvarman from start of Harṣavardhana rule (605-646 AD), his time is calculated after Huensang. Extract of ‘Nepal chronology’ by Kota Venkatachalam, 1953, Vijayawada. is given below- Nepal Kings- Gopāla-vamśa-(1) Bhuktamānāgata Gupta (4159-4071 BC), ***Ahīra-vamśa-***Three kings of India ruled for 200 years Kirāta-vamśa-(12) Yalambarā, (18) Jitedāstī-He died in Mahābhārata war on Pāṇḍava side. This is also described in Kirāta-parva under Vana- parva of Mahābhārata and famous epic Kirātārjunīyam of Daṇḍī. 7 kings ruled for 300 years (3437-3138 BC), Soma-vamśa-(41) Nimiṣa, (42) Mānākśa, (43) Kākavarman, (44-48)-Unknown, (49) Paśuprekśa Deva-In his pe-

riod many persons came from India in 1867 BC (period of Buddha and Mahāvīra in Bihar). These 9 kings ruled for 464 years (2319-1875 BC) , (52) Bhāskaravarman-He conquered India (some adjacent parts) and without any son. He adopted Aramāna of Sūrya vaṁśa who became king in 1712 BC in name of Bhūmivarman. Sūrya vaṁśa- (53) Bhūmivarman (1712-1645 BC), .. (83) Viśvadevavarman (151-101 BC). After him his son-in-law became king. Ṭhākurī-vaṁśa-(84) Aṁśuvarman (101-33 BC)-Paramāra king Vikramāditya of Ujjain came in 57 BC and started his Vikrama-samvat at Paśupatinātha from Chaitra śukla 1st. (85) Kṛtavarman (33 BC-54 AD), (86) Bhīmārjuna (54-147 AD). Inscriptions-As Vikrama samvat was started in period of Aṁśuvarman (101-33 BC), his earlier inscriptions are as- sumed in Śrīharṣa-śaka (456 BC) which is wrongly related to Harṣavardhana of Thaneswar (605-646 AD) who had never started any era as per his own writings or as per his biographer Bāṇabhaṭṭa or Chinese traveller Huen- sang. Later inscriptions are in Vikrama-samvat.-http://indepigr.narod.ru/licchavi/content81.htm (1) No. 69-Samvat 535-Śrāvaṇa śukla 7 (if it is in Śrīharṣa-śaka of 456 BC, year will be 79 AD-long after his rule. Thus, reference is Chāpa śaka of 612 BC giving date of 77 BC-after start of Aṁśuvarman rule and before Vikrama -samvat.) (2) No. 76-Samvat 29-Jyeṣṭha śukla 10. ( Vikrama samvat now onwards) (3) No. 77-Samvat 30- Jyeṣṭha śukla 6. (4) No. 78-Samvat 31-Prathama (month name missing-Pauṣa as per next inscription) pañchamī-that year had adhika month. (5) No. 79-Samvat 31-Dvitīya Pauṣa śukla aṣṭamī. (6) No. 80-Samvat 31, Māgha śukla 13. (7) No. 81-Samvat 32, Āṣāḍha śukla 13. (8) No. 83-Samvat 34-Prathama Pauṣa śukla 2-year of extra month. (9) No. 84-Samvat 36- Āṣāḍha śukla 12. (10) No. 85-Samvat 37-Phālguna śukla 5. (11) No. 86-Samvat 39-Vaiśākha śukla 10. (12) No. 87-Samvat 43-Vyatīpāta- Jyeṣṭha kṛṣṇa (date missing). (13) No. 89-Samvat 45- Jyeṣṭha śukla (date missing) Jiṣṇugupta has 2 inscriptions in which dates are missing. His coins have been found. One is shown on http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Licchavi_(kingdom).

Copper coin of Jishnu Gupta (ca. AD 622-633) of the Nepalese Licchhavi Dynasty. Obverse. The inscription above the winged horse is Śrī Jiṣṇu Guptasya. 4. Reasons of Falsification—(1) Racial superiority war- After colonial rule of Europeans, only research in history is to show racial superiority of Greeko-Roman civilization whose successors were these countries-Britain, France etc. (2) Biblical date of creation-(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Ussher)-James Ussher (sometimes spelled Usher) (4 January 1581 – 21 March 1656) was Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland be- tween 1625–56. He was a prolific scholar, who most famously published a chronology that purported to establish the time and date of the creation as the night preceding Sunday, 23 October 4004 BC, according to the proleptic Julian calendar. Till today, history of world is being fitted after that, though it is well known that earth was created about 4.5 billions years ago and current human species is at least 1.5 million years old. (3) Deliberate post dating of Indian history-Declared aim of Boden chair at Oxford University in 1831 was to de- stroy Vedic culture so that Indians can be shown light of Christianity. For that, many distortions were done-(1) All kings who started a calendar were declared fictitious, though there are voluminous records of them. (2) Everything in Vedas or old literature was declared to be works of illiterates by persons who themselves were ignorant of those subjects. (3) All Indian texts are considered false. Though entire old history is solely from purāṇas, their chronol- ogy is arbitrarily changed. Only Indus valley inscriptions are considered authentic though they have not been read till today. (4) Greco-Roman tradition of forgery-Greco-Roman tradition of forgery of history to show cultural superiority has continued till Boden Chair declaration of Oxford in 1831 to destroy Vedic culture. Under tradition of slavery, it still continues by Indian devotees. One of the comments of Berosus can be seen on http://www.angelfire.com/nt/Gilgamesh/classic.html- Berosus derided the "Greek historians" who had so distorted the history of his country. He knew, for example, that it was not Semiramis who founded the city of Babylon, but he was himself the prisoner of his own environ- ment and cannot have known more about the history of his land than was known in Babylonia itself in the 4th cen- tury BC.. (5) George Hulze, Epigrapher of Madras (now Chennai) in 1909, read in Rājatarangiṇī that 43rd Kashmir king Go- nanda (1440-1400 BC) became Bauddha due to which Bauddhas of central Asia destroyed his kingdom. This story was fitted to Maurya Ashoka (1472-1436 BC) and both shifted to 269 BC to fit his grandfather with Maegas- thenes. (6) Sewel, S.B. Dixit, Kielhorn studied all the Indian eras. But all insisted that Śālivāhana śaka of 78 AD was only śaka and was linked with Kashmir king Kaniṣka of 1294-1234 BC. Thus, dates of all astronomers born much be- fore that were interpreted in that era only. (7) Abul Fazal had given date of start of Din-elahi in all earlier eras starting with Yudhiṣṭhira (17-12-3139 BC), Śrīharṣa (456 BC), Vikrama (57 BC) and Śālivāhana (78 AD). To destroy history, all these were declared fictitious after studying their calendars in detail. (8) William Jones changed date of Āryabhaṭīya from 360 Kali to 3600 Kali which was obeyed by Sudhakara

Dwivedi to become Principal of Queen’s Sanskrit college, Varanasi in his translation. But it was never explained why he chose the base year of start of kali in stead of at least 12 eras starting up to 3600 Kali. (9) There was more anger against Vikramāditya as he influenced west Asia and Roman empire by his di- rect rule upto Arab-His astrologers certified Jesus to be a great man, Jesus studied in India for 12 years termed as missing period, defeat and capture of Julius Caesar which led to his murder by Brutus, start of Julian and Hizra eras according to rules of Vikrama Samvat. ) Calendar Committee report-part 3 (CSIR publication) also mentions that Vikrama samvat has influenced start of Julian calendar in 46 BC after delay of 7 days. He intended to start year from winter solstice, but people started 7 days later with new moon. It is assumed that 7 days after winter solstice of 46 BC was new moon-actually it was full moon of Pauṣa after which Māgha Kṛṣṇa month started in Vikrama year 10 (lapsed). Vikrama samvat is only luni solar year in world which month starts with dark half. All our texts of astronomy and purāṇas still calculate adhika-māsa on basis of lunar month starting with bright half or new moon. To start a system opposed to general worldwide rule, it needs a powerful logic (shift of seasons by 45 days after start of kali) and a powerful king Vik- ramāditya who influenced India and Roman empire under Julius Caesar. That is why, no oriental scholar since British rule wants to admit existence of Vikramāditya and inserts fake stories in his name. It has also indicated that Hizra era started with start of Vikrama year 679. Quoted from History of the Calendar, by M.N. Saha and N. C. Lahiri (part C of the Report of The Calendar Re- forms Committee under Prof. M. N. Saha with Sri N.C. Lahiri as secretary in November 1952-Published by Council of Scientific & Industrial Research, Rafi Marg, New Delhi-110001, 1955, Second Edition 1992. Page, 168-last para-“Caesar wanted to start the new year on the 25th December, the winter solstice day. But people resisted that choice because a new moon was due on January 1, 45 BC. And some people considered that the new moon was lucky. Caesar had to go along with them in their desire to start the new reckoning on a tradi- tional lunar landmark.” Importance of winter solstice was ancient and Bhīṣma Pitāmaha departed on that very day in year 3139 BC-36 years before death of Śrī Kṛṣṇa. Now that day is called Christmas, though it was intended to be new year day. It has been assumed that the start was from new moon day. Actually, it was from start of Māgha month of Vikrama year 11 lapsed. Vikrama samvat is only year which starts with dark half-all other lunar years start from bright half starting with new moon. Strong following of Vikrama samvat, just 10 years after its inception in Rome against wishes of Caesar shows influence of Vikramāditya. Page 180-“It has been shown by Dr. Hashim Amir Ali of the Osmania University, Hyderabad, that the Moham- medan calendar was originally luni-solar in which intercalation was made when necessary, and not purely lunar. .... According to this view, proper intercalation was applied in all years where necessary up to A.H. 10 and conse- quently the year A.H. 11 which started on March 29, 632 A.D. (Footnote)-Initial epoch of the Hejira era thus arrived at is the evening of March 19, 622 A.D., Friday, the day fol- lowing the vernal equinox.” Thus, Hejira era also started with start of year in India-it was start of Vikrama year 679. Vedic ROOTS of pre- Islamic Arabia and the Kaaba

The text of the crucial Vikramāditya inscription, found inscribed on a gold dish hung inside the Kaaba shrine in Mecca, is found recorded on page 315 of a volume known as ‘Sayar-ul-Okul’ treasured in the Makhtab-e-Sultania library in Istanbul, Turkey. Rendered in free English the inscription says: "Fortunate are those who were born (and lived) during king Vikram’s reign. He was a noble, generous dutiful ruler, devoted to the welfare of his subjects. But at that time we Arabs, oblivious of God, were lost in sensual pleasures. Plotting and torture were rampant. The darkness of ignorance had enveloped our country. Like the lamb struggling for her life in the cruel paws of a wolf we Arabs were caught up in ignorance. The entire country was enveloped in a darkness so intense as on a new moon night. But the present dawn and pleasant sunshine of education is the result of the favour of the noble king Vikramaditya whose benevolent supervision did not lose sight of us- foreign- ers as we were. He spread his sacred religion amongst us and sent scholars whose brilliance shone like that of the sun from his country to ours. These scholars and preceptors through whose benevolence we were once again made cognizant of the presence of God, introduced to His sacred existence and put on the road of Truth, had come to our country to preach their religion and impart education at king Vikramaditya’s behest." http://www.guardiansofdarkness.com/GoD/muslims.pdf (5) Defeat and capture of Caesar by Vikramādiya of Ujjain (82 BC-19 AD)- Defeat of Caesar is noted in many places, e.g. at http://www.heritage-history.com/www/heritage.php?Dir=wars&FileName=wars_romanpersian.php The first Roman contact with the Parthian Empire came during the Mithridatic Wars which lasted from 82 to 63 B.C. The Kingdom of Pontus was an independent Kingdom that bordered on Parthian territory. By the third Mithi- datic War, the Romans pursued Mithridates and his ally, Tigranes, deep into Armenia, and conquered most of the Armenian Empire, including Syria and Judea for Rome. From this point on, the Eastern border of Rome's territory bordered on Parthia. Rome recognized that Parthia, far from being barbaric was a highly civilized country with rich booty. The lure of conquest was behind most of Rome's incursions into Parthian territory in the following centuries. Soon after Pompey had conquered Syria and Judea for Rome, Crassus, already one of the richest men in Rome, launched a campaign against Parthia in Mesopotamia. He was defeated however, with great slaughter at Carrhae (53 B.C.). Caesar was planning a campaign of retribution when he was assassinated so the task fell to his succes- sor in the east Mark Antony. www.livius.org/caa-can/caesar/caesar_t01.htm- In 75, Julius Caesar was captured by Cilician pirates, who infested the Mediterranean sea. The Romans had never sent a navy against them, because the ... Vikramāditya has become most hated by Oxford because his calendar is still followed for all festivals surviving attempts to change it. Jyotirvidābharaṇa of Kālidāsa has been declared fake as it describes arrest of Caesar by him. But 3 epics indicated here are not considered fake and studied widely-Raghuvamśa, Meghadūta, Ku- mārasambhava. ज्योतिर्विदाभरण,ग्रन्थाध्यायनिरूपणम् २२विक्रमार्कवर्णनम्- वर्षे श्रुतिस्मृतिविचारविवेकरम्ये श्रीभारते खधृतिसम्मितदेशपीठे।

मत्तोऽधुना कृतिरियं सति मालवेन्द्रे श्रीविक्रमार्कनृपराजवरे समासीत् ॥ २२.७ ॥ नृपसभायां पण्डितवर्गाः- शङ्कुः सुवाग्वररुचिर्मणिराङ्गदत्तो जिष्णुस्त्रिलोचनहरो घटखर्पराख्यः। अन्येऽपि सन्ति कवयोऽमरसिंहपूर्वा यस्यैव विक्रमनृपस्य सभासदोऽमी ॥ २२.८ ॥ सत्यो वराहमिहिरः श्रुतसेननामा श्रीबादरायणमणित्थकुमारसिंहाः। श्रीविक्रमार्क नृपसंसदि सन्ति चैते श्रीकालतन्त्रकवयस्त्वपरे मदाद्याः ॥ २२.९ ॥ नवरत्नानि- धन्वन्तरि क्षपणकामरसिंहशङ्कुवैतालभट्टघटखर्परकालिदासाः। ख्यातो वराहमिहिरो नृपतेः सभायां रत्नानि वै वररुचिर्नव विक्रमस्य ॥ २२.१० ॥ सभापरिजना- अष्टौ यस्य शतानि मण्डलधराधीशाः सभायां सदा, स्युः संसत्परिणाहकोटिसुभटाः सत्पण्डिताः षोडश। दैवज्ञा दशपण्मिताश्च भिषजो भट्टास्तथा ढाढिनो वेदज्ञा रसचन्द्रमा विजयते श्रीविक्रमः सोऽधिभूः ॥ २२.११ ॥ सैन्यवर्णनम्- यस्याष्टादशयोजनानि कटके पादातिकोटित्रयं वाहनानामुतायुतं च नवतिखिन्ना कृतिर्हस्तिनाम्। नौकालक्षचतुष्टयं विजयिनो यस्य प्रयाणे भवत् सोऽयं विक्रमभूपतिर्विजयते नान्यो धरित्रीधरः ॥ २२.१२ ॥ शाकप्रवृत्तिकाल- येनास्मिन्वसुधातले शकगणांन्सर्वा दिशः सङ्गरे हत्वा पञ्चनवप्रमान्कलियुगे शाकप्रवृत्तिः कृता। श्रीमद्विक्रमभूपुजा प्रतिदिनं मुक्तामणित्वर्णगो सत्तीभाद्यपवर्जनेन विहितो धर्मः सुवर्णाननः ॥ २२.१३ ॥ दिग्विजयवर्णनम्- उद्दामद्रविडद्रुमैकपरशुर्लाटाटवीपावको, वेल्लद्वङ्गभुजङ्गराजगरुडो गौडाब्धिकुम्भोद्भवः। गर्जद् गुर्जरराजसिंधुरहरिर्धारान्धकारार्यमाः, काम्बोजाम्बुजचन्द्रमा विजयते श्रीविक्रमार्को नृपः ॥ २२.१४ ॥ प्रभुत्ववर्णनम्- येनाप्युग्रमहीधराग्रविषये दुर्गाण्यसह्यान्यहो, नीत्वा यानि नतीकृतास्तदधिपाः दत्तानि तेषां पुनः। इन्द्राम्भोध्यमरद्रुमरसुरक्ष्माभृद् गणेनाञ्जसा, श्रीमद्विक्रमभूपुताखिलजनाम्भोजेन्दुना मण्डले ॥ २२.१५ ॥ उज्जयिनीवर्णनम्- यद्राजधान्युज्जयिनी महापुरी सदा महाकालमहेशयोगिनी। समाश्रयिप्राण्यपवर्गदायिनी श्रीविक्रमार्कोऽवनिपो जयत्यपि ॥ २२.१६ ॥ यो रुक्मदेशाधिपतिं शकेश्वरं जित्वा गृहीत्वोज्जयिनीं महाहवे। आनीय सम्भ्राम्य मुमोच यत्त्वहो स विक्रमार्कः समसह्यविक्रमः ॥ २२.१७ ॥ तस्मिन् सदाविक्रममेदिनीशे विराजमाने समवन्तिकायाम्। सर्वप्रजामङ्गलसौख्यसम्पद् बभूव सर्वत्र च वेदकर्म ॥ २२.१८ ॥ शङ्कादिपण्डितवराः कवयस्त्वनेके ज्योतिर्विदः सभमवंश्च वराहपूर्वाः। श्रीविक्रमार्कनृपसंसदि मान्यवृद्धिरस्तत्राप्यहं नृपसखा किल कालिदासः ॥ २२.१९ ॥ काव्यत्रयं सुमतिकृद्रघुवंशपूर्वं पूर्वं ततो ननु कियच्छुतिकर्मवादः। ज्योतिर्विदाभरणकालविधानशास्त्रं श्रीकालिदासकवितो हि ततो बभूव ॥ २२.२० ॥ वर्षेः सिन्धुरदर्शनाम्बरगुणैर्याते कलौ (3068 Kali)

इति श्रीकविकालिदासोदिते ज्योतिर्विदाभरणे ग्रन्थाध्यायनिरूपणक्रमनृपविक्रमवीरवर्णनाध्यायो द्वाविंशतितमः ॥ २२ ॥ (10) Result is that Indian students deny existence of all literature which they study for whole life and assume base- less things for which there is no reference or mention. All students of Sanskrit literature study Mṛcchhakaṭikam of Śūdraka, then tell that there is no reference of this king because he started Mālava Samvat in 756 BC. It contin- ued till Śrī Harṣa śaka 456 BC which has been called 300 years of democracy by Megasthenes. After reading Nai- shasha-charita of Śrī Harṣa and Nāgāvalī of Harṣavardhana (605-646 AD) and Harṣa-charita of Bāṇabhaṭṭa, Śrī Harṣa is equated with Harṣavardhana. Most study is of works by Nava-ratnas of Vikramāditya –Amara-koṣa of Amara Simha, Jaina texts of Kṣapaṇaka, Suśruta-saṃhitā of Dhanvantari, Bṛhat-saṃhitā, Bṛhat-Jātaka, Pañcha- siddhāntikā of Varāhamihira, Raghuvamśa, Meghadūta, Kumāra-sambhava of Kālidāsa, present version of Purāṇas by Betāla Bhaṭṭa, and survey by Śanku revived by Moghul king Akbar. Literature on Vikramāditya is next only to Rāma and Kṛṣṇa, but it is claimed that there is no mention about him. A fake Vikramāditya has been cre- ated in Chandragupta-2 of Gupta period, about him only half word has been found-‘Chandra’-on Mehrauli iron pil- lar of Delhi. If it is assumed Chandragupta, then it could be one of 3 famous-1 in Maurya and 2 in Gupta period. But capital of all was at Patna, not at Delhi. Chandra only meant that it was to mark northernmost position of moon motion in 456 BC when Śrī Harṣa started his śaka in 456 BC and Kutub-Minār made, called Pillar of Hercules by Megasthenes.