रत्नावली नाटिका (सम्राट हर्षवर्धन - शास्त्रीय नाटिका रत्न सम्पूर्ण ४ अङ्क सान्वय सटीक)

! Wait, what is before क्ष? Is it प? विपक्षः? Why would it say: "verb विपक्षः"? Wait! Could "verb" NOT be the English word "verb"? Wait, look at the letters: v e r b? Yes, 'v', 'e', 'r', 'b'! It is clearly "verb". Then why would it be followed by something meaning "is intended" or "is elided"? Wait! "verb विवक्षितः"? But there are only three letters! Wait, could it be: "verb विवक्षः"? No, Kale was an English/Sanskrit scholar, he wouldn't write ungrammatical "verb विवक्षः". Wait, could it be a misprint in the book? Look at line 18: "मनोरमः;" instead of "मनोरमायाम्" or "मनोरमायां"! The book definitely has typos (it's a 19th/early 20th century Indian print). Wait, could it be "verb विवक्षा"? Look at the end: is it a visarga ः or ा? Wait, look at the two dots: Are there two dots? Look at: वि [glyph] [glyph] Wait, is the first letter after 'verb